The purpose of this study is to determine Aristotles attitude toward the content and method of Platos natural science. Plato and Aristotle have often been regarded as on opposite sides of a philosophic Great Divide. On the other hand; those who have found that the two men were in agreement have sometimes mentioned only scattered instances of that agreement. There is need for a new comparison of the two philosopher- one which is limited in scope; based on the primary texts; and which is systematic and thorough in method. If successful; such a comparison would bring into sharp focus one phase of Aristotles comments on Plato. Our attempt to meet this need is Aristotles Criticism of Platos TIMAEUS. In pursuing this study; it has been necessary to reject a number of uncritically-accepted interpreshy; tations of the Timaeus. Contrary to the view of many; we have concluded that Aristotle largely agreed with Plato; both in the principles and presuppositions of his natural science. A number of implications stem from this study. There is; for example; the oft-questioned manner in which Aristotle treated Platos philosophy. In the great majority of instances; Aristotle stands forth as a reliable reporter and a skilled critic. Moreover; the study sheds light on that ancient riddle: whether Plato and Aristotle are basically akin or at odds in their general philosophies.
#1462395 in eBooks 2014-01-20 2014-01-20File Name: B00HU5A1UM
Review
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful. How we got here from thereBy klavierspielIn its relatively concise length; Kenneth Hamiltons book deals with several related questions concerning the history of piano performance in a remarkably comprehensive fashion. Beginning with the broadest questions; such as where and for whom pianists customarily performed in the nineteenth century; the author; himself a distinguished pianist; continues with issues such as the length and composition of concert programs; the role of improvisation in public performances; memorization; and the eternal problem of fidelity to the printed score and respect for the composers intentions.It is inevitable that the figure of Franz Liszt would take center stage in a book that asks whether there was indeed a "golden age" of pianism. One of the singular virtues of Hamiltons work is that the great pianist and composer is presented as the complex; multifaceted figure he was. His public performances were very different from piano recitals today; with assisting artists; improvisation; so-called "preluding;" and above all; vocal and frequently riotous audience expression. In fact; they were quite a bit like popular music concerts are today. How we got from those lively; frequently lightweight and sloppy; but exciting events to the solemn; reverent affairs that piano concerts are today is a central; though hardly the only; topic of Hamiltons discourse. He shows us that although something has arguably been gained by this transformation; something also has been lost.There are some tedious stretches in the book--it is difficult to enliven; for example; a chapter that is basically a recitation of concert programs played by this or that pianist--and not all of the authors observations are fresh. It is hardly news to read; for example; that modern recording technology has altered both performers attitudes toward and audiences expectations of live performance. Nevertheless; Hamiltons perception and frequent sharp wit serve to make "After the Golden Age" an engaging and entertaining read; despite copious footnotes and documentation.2 of 2 people found the following review helpful. After the Golden Age: An excellent walk to the past in piano historyBy Dennis E. FerraraA truly excellent reference book including a proper discussion of various eras as well as famous pianists of the past. The bibliography section is extremely noteworthy; moreover; Hamilton presents both positive and negative sides of several questions. There is humor as well as fantastic examples of past writings of famous pianists. This book is highly recommeded for pianists; music lovers and aficandoes alike. One only wishes that photographs were available. Pianists could learn much from this book.1 of 1 people found the following review helpful. this is a good insight to how piano playing has changed so dramatically ...By Randall ReadeWell researched. this is a good insight to how piano playing has changed so dramatically over the past hundred years or so; to our detriment. Today; all pianists sound the same; but back then; everyone valued individuality in their performances. I think it was more interesting back then.
